The skills gap vs. the motivation gap

We love to blame the skills gap for our hiring struggles, but, after spending years in this business, I’ve learned it’s often not a skills gap at all. A lot of times, the problem is a motivation gap, and we’re the ones creating it.

Think about your last few rejected candidates. How many were actually missing critical skills versus missing the exact combination of software, certifications, and years of experience on your wish list?

When we write job descriptions that require “5+ years of experience with Technology X,” which has only been around for three years, we create unnecessary barriers.

Instead of, “Do they have every skill today?” the real question is, “Can they learn what they need, and are they motivated to do it?” A motivated candidate with 80% of the skills will outperform an unmotivated one with 100% every time.

Here’s the shift: Instead of screening people out for what they lack, start screening for their capacity and drive to learn. Ask about times they’ve had to quickly master something new. Look for side projects, self-taught skills, or career pivots that show initiative. These patterns tell you more about future performance than a checklist of current capabilities.

The “skills gap” narrative lets us off the hook. It suggests the problem is lies with the candidates who aren’t qualified enough. But when we’re willing to invest in people with the right motivation and learning ability, that gap gets a lot smaller.

Previous
Previous

Why the job search hasn’t actually changed

Next
Next

What ghost candidates are really telling you