Volume vs. high-touch? You still have to be human

There’s a tension in recruiting right now between two realities. Some roles demand volume — you need 50 warehouse associates by next month, and speed is everything. Other roles require a high-touch approach — a director-level search where every candidate interaction matters. Most recruiting teams manage both at the same time.

Here’s what I see too often: organizations pick one approach and apply it to everything. The high-volume team blasts and ghosts. The high-touch team moves so carefully that the process takes months. Neither is working as well as it should.

The truth is, being human doesn’t require being slow. Even in a high-volume process, small things make a real difference. An automated confirmation email that tells candidates what to expect next. A text message with the hiring manager’s name before an interview, so they’re not walking in blind. A rejection message that’s honest and timely instead of a form letter three months later — or worse, silence.

And on the high-touch side, being thorough doesn’t mean being inaccessible. Candidates in an executive search still want to know where they stand. They still want communication that feels personal, not like they’re being “managed.”

The question isn’t whether you’re running a volume process or a high-touch process. It’s whether the humans on the other end of your process feel like they matter. The organizations that get this right don’t treat “volume” and “human” as opposites. They design their process so that scale and respect coexist. That’s not idealistic. It’s just good recruiting.

Next
Next

What I’m thinking about: We’re asking them to pick too soon